United Forum may decide for an Indefinite Banking Strike

Come June 12, the United Forum of Bank Employees, representing the one million strong bank employees of government banks, is meeting at Chennai to decide the next course of action after the last national strike on May 30-31, and this time the Forum may even decide for an indefinite banking strike in India, as a last resort.

More than a week ago, the nine trade unions of government bank employees, 4 being of officers and 5 of others, had gone for two days long strike after they rejected the Indian Banks’ Association’s (IBA) proposal for a 2% wage hike. The salary-structure of the bank employees is fixed up through a bi-partite settlement, unlike Central and State Govt employees. After every 5 years, the salary is hiked to have the protection against inflation. The last settlement was for the period 2012-17 of 15%, which was not matching with the then 6th Pay Commission. But this time the increment for the period 2017-2022, which came only a few weeks ago, seven months delayed, the employees expected a parity with the new 7th Pay Commission of the Central government, but rather was offered merely 2%, on the plea of low profitability of banks.

The 2% wage hike will cost banks approximately Rs 500 crore, while the proposal given by the unions will cost around Rs 12000 crore, and this is surely open to negotiation. IBA and the central government are linking it with the profitability but there was no hesitation to write off Rs 2.41 lakh crores in last 3 years, and gross NPA (Non Performing Assets) stands at Rs.6.41 lacs crores today, according to RBI figures, which was around Rs.3 lacs crores in 2014. For the last four years, banks have been earning operating gross annual profits ranging from Rs.1.3 lacs crores to Rs.1.6 lacs crores, but net profit is wiped out due to the bad loans, given not at the whims of employees and the faulty provisioning norms, but through political decisions.

As per RBI data of March 31, 2018, Non Performing Assets of government banks amount to ₹6.41 lacs Cr, of which Corporate Industry NPA is around ₹4.7 lacs Cr (73%), Agriculture Sector NPA is ₹ 57,000 Cr (9%), Services Sector NPA is ₹ 85,000 Cr (13%), and Retail Sector NPA is around ₹24,000 Cr (4%). It is important to note that the Corporate Industry Loans are sanctioned by government-appointed Board Level Executives to corporate bodies like Bhushan Steel, Lanco Infra, Essar Steel, Amtek, Monnet Ispat, Reliance, Adani groups, and to people like Nirav Modi, Vijay Mallya, et al. Agricultural NPA is mostly due to Farm Loan Waiver policies by elected governments just before or after elections, and so such borrowers misuse loans as they have a sense of political entitlement. Services NPA is mostly like MUDRA loan, where the current central government bars Banks to take collateral, and hence Banks cannot recover and the borrowers happily default. Retail NPA, accounting for around 4% of all NPAs, is the only NPA where a common branch level Banker makes a sanction in form of Housing, Car, Personal Loan et al. Hence, the one million banking employees find cheated today to be punished for the crime done by political decisions.

Interestingly, the government is not complying with the recommendations of its own appointed standing committee that the corporate deliberate defaulters’ names should be published and the accountability of the board representatives be fixed as to who have given green signals for sanctioning loans to the deliberate defaulters.

Further, the bank employees are the architects for fulfilment of all government aspirations through successful implementation of Atal Pension Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana, Adhar-bank account linking, Mudra loan, Stand Up and Start Up projects funding, Jandhan accounts and the Herculean work following the ill-advised demonetisation, during which some 19 bank employees died on duty.

There indeed should be parity, co-relation, uniformity and relativity of our salary with others in insurance and other sectors of the government, matching with the status and the risk, responsibility, accountability and transferability we are to undertake. Further, the dissenting employees’ charter of demands has asked for a five-day working week and more facilities for women employees.

As matters stand today, the issue of the banking employees is assuming a national proportion and in an economy which clocks around 6 to 8% annual inflation, there is no justification of 2% salary increment for all bankers as a constant for half a decade next.

2 Comments

  1. Offering Just 2% is nothing but mockery. A look at the DA rise shows that it more than this offer.
    This DA rise is to compensate ever rising cost of living.

    Wage revision is the legitimate expectation of an employee any where.

    In the wake of fashion to raise pay, perks and other non monetary benefits by elected body members by themselves, a serious view could be taken to sustain morale of continuous and hard working employees. If a proper attention is not paid to this issue, a large and speedy turn over in HR would result in draining intellectuals to other fields ,if not to other countries.
    Banks, only through its employees’ hard and sincere work would be able to contribute to wealth creation for a nation. There is a need to come out of long carried prejudicial view for Bank employees

    Suggested that a look in the pay hike in other sectors, would justify the demands.

  2. Just compare the salaries of other PSU sector with banks. No match between these, likewise if IBA says NPA and other losses for non implementing the new updated salaries for bank than compare this system with other service sector, they are also not performing according to their memorandum. So why these partialities with bank employees only.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*